Current Court Cases ·

Acland Court of Appeal case a step closer

19 June, 2018

EDO Qld client Oakey Coal Action Alliance has filed written submissions to the the Court of Appeal in relation the Acland case. This appeal seeks to overturn the 2018 Supreme Court decision that would see groundwater impacts no longer allowed to be considered in some mining objection hearings. A review is expected in September.

Update July 2018:
OCAA has filed written submissions on 25 July 2018. The parties are in Court for a review of the matter in September 2018 (date TBC). This matter will run concurrently with the remitted hearing in the Land Court.
Read more: The drain on Acland farmers
Update June 2018:

On 13 June 2018, New Acland Coal Pty Ltd filed its contention to OCAA’s appeal in the Queensland Court of Appeal on multiple grounds.

OCAA file appeal to Supreme Court decision
EDO Qld client Oakey Coal Action Alliance (OCAA) appealed to the Court of Appeal against the expansion of the controversial New Acland Coal (NAC) mine in prime agricultural land on the Darling Downs on 30 May 2018.
EDO Qld client Oakey Coal Action Alliance (OCAA) appealed to the Court of Appeal against the expansion of the controversial New Acland Coal (NAC) mine in prime agricultural land on the Darling Downs.

The appeal relates to a 2018 Supreme Court decision that would see groundwater impacts no longer allowed to be considered in some mining objection hearings.

NAC’s mine expansion application first commenced in 2007 and was rejected by the Newman government in 2012, stating it was ‘inappropriate’ to expand the mine in the State’s southern food bowl.

A revised application lodged in 2015 was recommended for refusal by the Land Court in 2017 following a 99-day hearing which found that, among other things:

  1. the land around Acland was amongst the best 1.5% of agricultural land in Queensland;
  2. there were major shortcomings with the groundwater impact predictions, such that the Stage 3 should not proceed given the risks to the surrounding landholders; and
  3. a stricter night time noise limit should be applied than that currently proposed.

The Department of Environment and Science (DES) followed the Land Court’s recommendation to refuse the environmental approval on 14 February 2018. In June 2017 the mining company applied to the Supreme Court for a judicial review of the Land Court decision.

 

Related news