Current Court Cases · Access to Justice

Acland Court of Appeal review nears

28 September, 2018

The hearing date for Oakey Coal Action Alliance’s appeal and New Acland Coal’s cross appeal has now been listed for a two day hearing on 27-28 February 2019. The appeal seeks to overturn the 2018 Supreme Court decision that would see groundwater impacts no longer allowed to be considered in some mining objection hearings. 

Update September 2018:

Barrister Dr Chris McGrath, supported by EDO Qld, appeared at the review hearing in the Court of Appeal on 5 September 2018. A number of procedural dates were set in preparation for the hearing for the appeal and cross appeal listed for 27-28 February 2019.

Update August 2018:
EDO Qld client Oakey Coal Action Alliance has filed written submissions to the the Court of Appeal in relation to the Acland case. This appeal seeks to overturn the 2018 Supreme Court decision that would see groundwater impacts no longer allowed to be considered in some mining objection hearings. A review is expected in September.
Update July 2018:
OCAA has filed written submissions on 25 July 2018. The parties are in Court for a review of the matter in September 2018 (date TBC). This matter will run concurrently with the remitted hearing in the Land Court.
Read more: The drain on Acland farmers
Update June 2018:

On 13 June 2018, New Acland Coal Pty Ltd filed its contention to OCAA’s appeal in the Queensland Court of Appeal on multiple grounds.

OCAA file appeal to Supreme Court decision
EDO Qld client Oakey Coal Action Alliance (OCAA) appealed to the Court of Appeal against the expansion of the controversial New Acland Coal (NAC) mine in prime agricultural land on the Darling Downs on 30 May 2018.
EDO Qld client Oakey Coal Action Alliance (OCAA) appealed to the Court of Appeal against the expansion of the controversial New Acland Coal (NAC) mine in prime agricultural land on the Darling Downs.

The appeal relates to a 2018 Supreme Court decision that would see groundwater impacts no longer allowed to be considered in some mining objection hearings.

NAC’s mine expansion application first commenced in 2007 and was rejected by the Newman government in 2012, stating it was ‘inappropriate’ to expand the mine in the State’s southern food bowl.

A revised application lodged in 2015 was recommended for refusal by the Land Court in 2017 following a 99-day hearing which found that, among other things:

  1. the land around Acland was amongst the best 1.5% of agricultural land in Queensland;
  2. there were major shortcomings with the groundwater impact predictions, such that the Stage 3 should not proceed given the risks to the surrounding landholders; and
  3. a stricter night time noise limit should be applied than that currently proposed.

The Department of Environment and Science (DES) followed the Land Court’s recommendation to refuse the environmental approval on 14 February 2018. In June 2017 the mining company applied to the Supreme Court for a judicial review of the Land Court decision.

 

Environmental Defenders Office Queensland (EDO Qld) gives a strong legal voice to the environment when needed most.

Take Action

The latest from EDO Qld

Mt Coot-tha Zipline

We’re going to court over Adani’s North Galilee Water Scheme

Adani says it’s ready to start work – Are you ready to accept that?

Swim For The Reef 2019 is here!

This bill could stop mining in the Galilee